Innocent or Slut? - Page 2 - Rape Board

gal4 · 07-03-2006, 04:04 PM

No, did not mean you, madame.

Incidentally, I love your speak softly and carry a big sledge hammer approach.

Definitely more persuasive than PG's direct attack approach.

I prefer an indirect approach.

Militarily, a direct attack always invites disaster.

1. Charles X!!'s direct attack on Peter , Poltava, 1709

2. Pickett's charge against Chamberlin, Gettysburg.,1864

3. Falkenhayn against Petain, Verdun, 1916

4. Paulus against Chuikov, Stalingrad, 1942

Yeah, and the most devastating

5. Charles VI against Henry V, Agincourt, 1415

innocent · 07-03-2006, 04:06 PM

thats cool then. i find this approach generates most fun for me as the poor sods never know what to expect. keeps em on their toes anyways!

4funonly · 07-03-2006, 05:19 PM

I went to a Catholic School for several years before High School. While in High School, I worked in a strip club. (The first one sucked, second one was WAAYY more fun.) I have been with both. The "good Catholic girls" who would blow your mind (and other things) if you knew what they did on dates, and the strippers. They both have their own special qualities. Either one, I don't care as long as she has a great a$$ and beautiful eyes!

innocent · 07-03-2006, 05:23 PM

not one to blow my my own trumpet ( i'd rather blow someone elses!) but i qualify!
wasnt catholic school girl but family catholic. gutted now i didnt get to go to the local catholic school just for the fun after.....

Rogue · 07-03-2006, 05:34 PM

Interesting that the majority, myself included, prefer the innocent type, yet the word slut is all over this forum's posts and stories. The guys use it as degradation, the girls to show their enjoyment of loving something they should hate.

07-03-2006, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gal4

No, did not mean you, madame.

Incidentally, I love your speak softly and carry a big sledge hammer approach.

Definitely more persuasive than PG's direct attack approach.

I prefer an indirect approach.

Militarily, a direct attack always invites disaster.

1. Charles X!!'s direct attack on Peter , Poltava, 1709

2. Pickett's charge against Chamberlin, Gettysburg.,1864

3. Falkenhayn against Petain, Verdun, 1916

4. Paulus against Chuikov, Stalingrad, 1942

Yeah, and the most devastating

5. Charles VI against Henry V, Agincourt, 1415

lmao @ you comparing conversations to wars...

no wonder u have a hard time communicating

kinkyone · 07-05-2006, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by persiangurl

lmao @ you comparing conversations to wars...

no wonder u have a hard time communicating

......

and need three boards and seven id's

....not to mention the annonymous pics

ROFLMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Grm · 07-05-2006, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by persiangurl

lmao @ you comparing conversations to wars...

no wonder u have a hard time communicating

All coversation is war, [ between females that is. ]

07-03-2006, 04:04 PM	#21
gal4 UnWanted Trick Baby Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 834 Reputation: 584	No, did not mean you, madame. Incidentally, I love your speak softly and carry a big sledge hammer approach. Definitely more persuasive than PG's direct attack approach. I prefer an indirect approach. Militarily, a direct attack always invites disaster. 1. Charles X!!'s direct attack on Peter , Poltava, 1709 2. Pickett's charge against Chamberlin, Gettysburg.,1864 3. Falkenhayn against Petain, Verdun, 1916 4. Paulus against Chuikov, Stalingrad, 1942 Yeah, and the most devastating 5. Charles VI against Henry V, Agincourt, 1415

07-03-2006, 04:06 PM	#22
innocent Privileged Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: uk Posts: 2,110 Reputation: 9976	thats cool then. i find this approach generates most fun for me as the poor sods never know what to expect. keeps em on their toes anyways!

07-03-2006, 05:19 PM	#23
4funonly Junior Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 22 Reputation: 599	I went to a Catholic School for several years before High School. While in High School, I worked in a strip club. (The first one sucked, second one was WAAYY more fun.) I have been with both. The "good Catholic girls" who would blow your mind (and other things) if you knew what they did on dates, and the strippers. They both have their own special qualities. Either one, I don't care as long as she has a great a$$ and beautiful eyes!

07-03-2006, 05:23 PM	#24
innocent Privileged Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: uk Posts: 2,110 Reputation: 9976	not one to blow my my own trumpet ( i'd rather blow someone elses!) but i qualify! wasnt catholic school girl but family catholic. gutted now i didnt get to go to the local catholic school just for the fun after.....

07-03-2006, 05:34 PM	#25
Rogue Immoral Irishman Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,344 Reputation: 20982	Interesting that the majority, myself included, prefer the innocent type, yet the word slut is all over this forum's posts and stories. The guys use it as degradation, the girls to show their enjoyment of loving something they should hate.