Rape Board - Free rape pictures and videos - Go To Main Page
Message board for people who wish to roleplay and discuss rape fantasies.

Real Time Bondage

Welcome to the Rape Board - Free rape pictures and videos.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.


Go Back   Rape Board - Free rape pictures and videos > Miscellaneous > Idle Talk
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Rape gallery Incest gallery Bestiality gallery Gay sex gallery Anime gallery Scat gallery

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2007, 01:47 AM   #1
LucyBoots
Member
 
LucyBoots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Reputation: 131
LucyBoots Level 1 (100+)LucyBoots Level 1 (100+)
Send a message via Yahoo to LucyBoots
Default Does this scare anyone?

I know we are only talking fantasies here, but does anyone find this concerning? The way our posts read, do you think it is possible to be mistaken for a criminal?

The article says:

Quote:
FBI turns to broad new wiretap method

The FBI appears to have adopted an invasive Internet surveillance technique that collects far more data on innocent Americans than previously has been disclosed.

Instead of recording only what a particular suspect is doing, agents conducting investigations appear to be assembling the activities of thousands of Internet users at a time into massive databases, according to current and former officials. That database can subsequently be queried for names, e-mail addresses or keywords.

Such a technique is broader and potentially more intrusive than the FBI's Carnivore surveillance system, later renamed DCS1000. It raises concerns similar to those stirred by widespread Internet monitoring that the National Security Agency is said to have done, according to documents that have surfaced in one federal lawsuit, and may stretch the bounds of what's legally permissible.

Call it the vacuum-cleaner approach. It's employed when police have obtained a court order and an Internet service provider can't "isolate the particular person or IP address" because of technical constraints, says Paul Ohm, a former trial attorney at the Justice Department's Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. (An Internet Protocol address is a series of digits that can identify an individual computer.)

That kind of full-pipe surveillance can record all Internet traffic, including Web browsing--or, optionally, only certain subsets such as all e-mail messages flowing through the network. Interception typically takes place inside an Internet provider's network at the junction point of a router or network switch.

The technique came to light at the Search & Seizure in the Digital Age symposium held at Stanford University's law school on Friday. Ohm, who is now a law professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and Richard Downing, a CCIPS assistant deputy chief, discussed it during the symposium.
LucyBoots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 01:59 AM   #2
Tanya
Privileged Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 505
Reputation: 2134
Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Tanya has a maximum reputation! (1000+)
Default

No. It shouldnt scare anyone unless they actually have something to hide
__________________
When im good im very very good, but when im bad im better!
Tanya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 02:35 PM   #3
clan_hunter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If anything they will aim this at terrorist's the FBI have bigger fish to fry that us.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 11:03 PM   #4
Andering REDDSON
Banned
 
Andering REDDSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: R/B’s cyber-Auschwitz
Posts: 609
Reputation: 1028
Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)
Default

This has already been gone over once…
Andering REDDSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 12:47 AM   #5
ChiTownHoney
Pa'l Mundo
 
ChiTownHoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ObamaNation
Posts: 2,460
Reputation: 33436
ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)ChiTownHoney has a maximum reputation! (1000+)
Default

I'm paranoid so yeah I have thought about that. I am scared to death of cops...I think they all act hard ass and are out to get everyone...and I dont trust them.

Well if they have me in a database for rapists.....thats funny as hell.

its more for men to be scared I think....you think you have a right to free speech but thats not so. Big brother is always watching, maybe not you but someone.
ChiTownHoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 03:30 PM   #6
LucyBoots
Member
 
LucyBoots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Reputation: 131
LucyBoots Level 1 (100+)LucyBoots Level 1 (100+)
Send a message via Yahoo to LucyBoots
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiTownHoney
its more for men to be scared I think.
The machine can't tell the difference between man and woman! It will investigate me either way.
LucyBoots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:54 PM   #7
Wiz
if ever a Wiz there was!
 
Wiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Great White North eh.
Posts: 1,854
Reputation: 23553
Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Wiz has a maximum reputation! (1000+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanya
No. It shouldnt scare anyone unless they actually have something to hide
With respect Tanya, that's a naive perspective IMHO. In the bigger picture, innocent people do get investigated, arrested and convicted of crimes. I once passed by an interrogation room, and I overheard a cop say to someone that I couldn't see "If you're innocent, you have nothing to fear. You don't need a lawyer." What a crock!
__________________
If you find that life is a short, meaningless journey filled with emptiness and pain, just get all the pussy you can.
Wiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 05:18 PM   #8
Louise
Privileged Member
 
Louise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,865
Reputation: 4905
Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Louise has a maximum reputation! (1000+)
Default

I do think the line where governments can go is hugely overstated. Anyone who has seen films like the enjoyable but silly Enemy of the State will know how governments allow such overstated suggestions of their capabilities to pass about. Thats not to say covert observation happens, for it surely does, but one must not let paranoia swamp rational reality.

Frankly if someone is having a good old wank over what I or others do here back in Whitehall or Langley...or Moscow for that matter...I couldnt give a flying fuck!
__________________
...no mercy in thy icy heart, for the lost prey you stalk and hunt, only the lust...
Louise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 12:18 AM   #9
Andering REDDSON
Banned
 
Andering REDDSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: R/B’s cyber-Auschwitz
Posts: 609
Reputation: 1028
Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)Andering REDDSON has a maximum reputation! (1000+)
Default

As a general rule, you can all relax… Let’s say I post a story about raping Condoleezza RICE. Fine.
The FBI might (maybe) actually come talk to me. And I could even spend a day or so cooling my heals in county jail…
But as the case of Julia WILSON shows us, that’s about it…
¿Now can we STOP repeating al JEZZERA’s paranoid rants? (For those who don’t know, al JAZZERA was long ago discredited as bin LADEN’S mouthpiece- They carry the same respectability as FOX News or Weekly World News among respectable journalists.)
Andering REDDSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2003 - 2013, (c) Rapeboard.com