View Single Post
Old 11-02-2010, 04:59 PM   #10
justmetoo
Privileged Member
 
justmetoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In your mind
Posts: 1,086
Reputation: 23015
justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)justmetoo has a maximum reputation! (1000+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwham View Post
I think the best way to handle the controversy of how revealing the images are, is to have separate scanners for male and females, that way the person doing the screening can be of the same gender as the person being screened
I'm not sure I agree. If the screener was gay then they could get the same presumed sexual satisfaction as a man checking a woman or vice versa.

From my point of view I think I'd be more worried about a gay guy checking me on the screen over rather than a woman. Don't get me wrong about gays - I have several that are friends. I just don't think this is a situation where you can have such a simple solution because from everything I read the issue with scanners comes down to being sexual in nature.
justmetoo is offline   Reply With Quote